Request a demo specialized to your need.
A trial budget isn't one number. It's four, moving at different speeds, telling different parts of the same story. What's already been paid. What's owed but hasn't gone out yet.
What's been earned by work already completed, whether or not it's been invoiced. And what the trial is on pace to cost by the time it's done. Most finance teams can answer at least one of these on demand. Fewer can answer all four without stopping to pull something together first and the gap between "I can tell you" and "let me check and get back to you" is usually where budget conversations lose their footing.
Payments: The One Number Everyone Already Tracks
Payments made is usually the easiest of the four to see, because it's the most concrete money either left the account or it didn't. Even here, though, "real time" means something specific: not a report generated last week, but a live record that reflects a payment the moment it's processed, tied back to the milestone or invoice that triggered it. Without that link, "payments made" is just a total, disconnected from whether the spend was actually justified by trial activity.
Outstandings: The Number That's Usually a Guess
What's currently owed but not yet paid is harder, because it depends on knowing every invoice that's been received, approved, and is sitting in a queue across every CRO and vendor relationship, each on its own submission schedule.
Most organizations can answer this for a single vendor easily and struggle to answer it across the full portfolio without manually pulling from several places. A live outstandings figure means that queue is visible as one number, not reconstructed vendor by vendor whenever someone asks.
Accruals: The Number That's Almost Always Stale
Accruals are meant to reflect the cost of work that's already happened, whether or not an invoice has arrived yet which makes them the most forward-looking of the payment-side numbers and also the easiest to let drift out of date.
A monthly accrual process is, by definition, describing a month-old picture of trial activity. If enrollment or visit completion accelerated in week two, an accrual built at month-end is already behind by the time anyone reads it. Real-time accruals means the number updates as milestones and visits actually complete, not on a fixed monthly cadence.
Forecasting: The Number Built on the Other Three
A forecast is only as good as the data feeding it. A forecast built on last quarter's burn rate and this quarter's static assumptions is a projection of the past, not a read on where the trial is actually headed.
A forecast that pulls from current payments, current outstandings, and current accruals updated as those three numbers move reflects what's actually happening now, which is a meaningfully different thing than a number generated once and left unchanged until the next planning cycle.
Periodic Reporting vs. Real-Time Visibility, Across All Four
| Periodic / Manual Reporting | Real-Time Visibility | |
|---|---|---|
| Payments | Reported after processing, in a batch | Reflects the moment a payment is made, tied to its trigger |
| Outstandings | Reconstructed vendor by vendor, on request | Visible as one current number across every vendor |
| Accruals | Built at month-end, already a few weeks old | Updates as milestones and visits actually complete |
| Forecasting | Based on static assumptions, refreshed periodically | Draws on current payments, outstandings, and accruals as they move |
| Time to answer "where do we stand" | Hours to days, depending on who compiles it | Immediate |
Why All Four Have to Move Together
Seeing one of these numbers clearly doesn't tell you much on its own. Payments made without outstandings gives you spend, not exposure. Accruals without forecasting tells you where you've been, not where you're headed.
The value shows up when all four are visible from the same current data, at the same time, because that's the only way a budget conversation can move from "here's what I remember" to "here's what's true right now."
Cloudbyz CTFM is built to keep these four connected rather than tracked separately payments tied to the milestones that trigger them, outstandings rolled up across every vendor and CRO relationship, accruals reflecting completed activity as it happens rather than a monthly snapshot, and forecasting drawing on all three as they update.
The CTFM Financial Navigator surfaces any of these on request, in plain language, without a separate report needing to be built first. How much of the manual reconciliation work that removes depends on how a given organization's invoicing and milestone data is structured the underlying principle is having all four numbers current at once, not just one of them.
See These Four Numbers on Your Own Trials
If getting a clear answer on payments, outstandings, accruals, and forecasts still means checking more than one place, it's worth seeing what it looks like when all four are current at once.
Subscribe to our Newsletter
