In a Tufts CSDD study of 257 sponsors and CROs, companies used an average of six applications to support each clinical study (Tufts CSDD via GlobeNewswire). Many of those systems keep their own copy of the same basic records: which sites are in the study, who the contacts are, and who should be paid.
These records look simple, but they are where many payment problems start. A site is set up in CTMS by the start-up team and again in the finance system by finance. A coordinator changes, and only one system is updated. A site asks for payments to go to its institution instead of the investigator, and the change reaches one record but not the other. When CTMS and CTFM share one record for sites, contacts and payees, those copies do not exist.
|
Record |
Used in CTMS for |
Used in CTFM for |
Risk when kept twice |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Site |
Activation, monitoring, milestones |
Site budget, invoices, payments |
Different names or IDs for the same site |
|
Contacts |
Visit scheduling, letters, training |
Invoice queries, payment notices |
Notices sent to people who have left |
|
Payee |
(Who the site is) |
Who receives the money |
Payment sent to the wrong entity |
|
Study status |
Active, on hold, closed |
Whether payments should continue |
Payments to closed or paused sites |
When the start-up team creates a site in CTMS, the same record is available to finance in CTFM. There is no second set-up, and no reconciliation of names, addresses or site numbers between systems.
Sites change coordinators, finance contacts and sub-investigators during a study. When contacts are held once, an update by the CTA or CRA reaches finance immediately, so invoice queries and payment notices go to the right person.
The payee is not always the site or the investigator. It may be the institution, a research foundation or a site network. Holding payee details against the site record, with approval for any change and an audit trail, reduces the risk of payments going to the wrong entity.
If a site is put on hold or closed in CTMS, finance needs to know before the next payment run. When status is shared, payments follow the site's actual status.
Operations, finance, start-up teams and CRAs all see the same site, contacts, payee and status. Disagreements about which version is right stop happening, because there is only one version.
Cloudbyz CTMS and CTFM are built natively on Salesforce as one platform, so sites, contacts, payee details and study status are held once and used by both. Because they share one data model, no integration is needed between them, and changes are recorded in a single audit trail. Integrations remain available for external finance or ERP systems where needed.
Book a demo or visit cloudbyz.com.