A Society for Clinical Research Sites landscape survey found that 80% of sites had six or fewer months of operating cash on hand (Applied Clinical Trials). For those sites, a payment that goes to the wrong party, or arrives in one lump that someone then has to divide by hand, is a real problem.
One site is often paid through more than one payee. A site managed by an SMO may need the SMO's fee paid separately from the institution's share. An investigator may be paid directly for some activities. A hospital pharmacy, radiology department or research foundation may invoice for its own part of the work. When the payment system treats each site as one payee, finance teams split the money outside the system, and the record of who was paid what is lost.
|
Arrangement |
Who is paid |
Typical split |
|---|---|---|
|
SMO-managed site |
SMO and institution |
SMO fee and site share per visit |
|
Investigator paid directly |
Institution and investigator |
Investigator fees for set activities |
|
Hospital departments |
Research office, pharmacy, radiology |
Each department's procedures |
|
Site network |
Network and member sites |
Network fee and member site share |
|
Research foundation |
Foundation instead of hospital |
All site payments to the foundation |
Each payee is recorded against the site with its details and its share of payments. Changes to payees go through an approval step and are kept in the audit trail.
The split can be a percentage of each payment, or specific line items assigned to specific payees, for example imaging to the radiology department and pharmacy fees to the pharmacy. The rules come from the site agreement.
When a visit is completed, the earned amount is calculated once and then divided between payees according to the rules. Each payee receives its own payment, and the total still matches what the site earned.
In a multi-site study, payee arrangements differ from site to site. One site may be paid through an SMO, another directly, a third through a foundation. Each site carries its own payee rules, so finance does not have to remember which is which.
SMOs, sites and investigators can see what has been earned, invoiced and paid to them, which cuts down on payment queries to the study team.
Cloudbyz Clinical Trial Financial Management (CTFM), built natively on Salesforce with Cloudbyz CTMS and EDC, supports splitting site payments between SMOs, sites, investigators and other payees, with different payee arrangements across the sites in a study. Completed visits generate earned amounts against the site budget, which are then divided according to each site's payee rules, and payees can see their status through portals. How splits and approvals are configured depends on each study's agreements.
The Cloudbyz team can walk through a site paid through an SMO and a second payee in CTFM. Book a demo or visit cloudbyz.com.